My assumption is that it will spur about $20mil in new construction which will bring in about $110k for the county and $90k for the city in new property taxes annually. You would think they would be interested in that but who knows. When are you submitting the request?

 

In analyzing the city's policy for extending sewer lines and the associated financial burden placed upon property owners, it becomes evident that certain inequities arise, particularly concerning the distribution of costs for extending sewer lines through publicly held properties. 

Firstly, it is imperative to acknowledge the foundational principles of the city's development policy. The mandate requiring new constructions to connect to the sewer system, coupled with the responsibility of developers to finance the extension of sewer mains up to and through their developments, forms the bedrock of this policy. 

However, the crux of the issue lies in the distribution of costs when it comes to extending sewer lines through public land. While privately held properties bear the financial responsibility for extending sewer lines through their respective parcels, the question arises as to why property owners are compelled to cover the costs of extending lines through public grounds. 

This discrepancy in cost allocation presents a glaring disparity based solely on the geographical proximity of properties to existing infrastructure. Property owners situated further from pre-existing sewer lines are disproportionately burdened with the financial responsibility of extending the lines, including the portion that traverses through public land. 

A cogent argument emerges questioning the rationale behind this approach. Shouldn't the cost of extending sewer lines through public land, which ostensibly benefits the broader community and aligns with a public mandate, be borne by the public at large? 

One could contend that the current methodology of cost distribution perpetuates a form of discrimination, favoring property owners in close proximity to existing infrastructure while placing an undue financial strain on others. While it is reasonable for developers to finance the extension of sewer lines through their properties, the imposition of costs associated with public land onto private property owners seems incongruous with principles of fairness and equity. 

A potential solution to mitigate this disparity could involve revisiting the cost allocation framework, whereby the burden of extending sewer lines through public land is more equitably shared among the broader community. Such an approach would not only promote fairness but also align more closely with the overarching objectives of public infrastructure development and equitable access to essential services within urban environments. 

In essence, while the city's policy for extending sewer lines serves a crucial function in urban development, it is imperative to critically examine the mechanisms by which costs are allocated to ensure fairness and equity among property owners, regardless of their proximity to existing infrastructure. 

 

[sixty two] 62 +/- new sing;e family homes